Infinite Quack

Franklin described our system as “A Republic… if you can keep it.” Any system of government only survives if it proves able to stand up to the endless series of challenges. If it fails those challenges, it doesn’t die or disappear; it mutates into something else. The Stormy Daniels case against Donald Trump isn’t about to topple America’s democratic institutions overnight, but it could, depending on its outcome, deepen some pre-existing cracks in the foundation. The details of the case aren’t terribly relevant here. It’s not about the events of January 6th. It’s not about Trump’s attempts to “find” more votes, or putting pressure on public officials whose job is to determine the outcome of an election. Nor is it about suggesting to the President of Ukraine that he “do [Trump] a favor” by digging into his political rival. All of those actions are much more central to the operation of our democracy. The Stormy Daniels case isn’t really about the porn star, or paying for sex. It’s about c...

chatGPT can never replace programmers "Never" is a long time. In a narrow sense, yes: maybe you can say that ChatGPT will never replace programmers entirely. But that's a straw man. We don't really care about the narrow statement, do we? Even if you expand it to "Large Language Models will never replace programmers entirely" (and I grok the argument that they can only ever mimic human-produced writing), that's not what we care about, either. What keeps us up at night is this: Can we never build any machine that can think well enough to replace programmers? There's no way to avoid the philosophical, with questions like this, so let's not mince words or dodge the key issue. Is there a magical component to the human brain? You, reader, can believe what you like. I can only describe my own beliefs: I'm a physicalist. I believe that matter and energy exist, the stuff that physics tries to study and understand... and that's it. If you believe t...